Delaware Asbestos & Mesothelioma Lawsuits: Deadlines, Claims, and Legal Options

In the heart of Delaware, a state with a rich industrial history, many have suffered the devastating effects of asbestos-related diseases. As a state that blends general tort law principles with specific adaptations for asbestos-related diseases, Delaware's legal landscape for asbestos litigation is as unique as its industrial past. This guide breaks down how asbestos lawsuits work in Delaware, providing clear answers about who can file, when, and under what circumstances.

This page is part of our broader mission. I started this firm after learning that the cancers that killed my father and grandparents were caused by asbestos—something we didn’t realize until it was too late to hold anyone accountable. That experience is why we built this site: to make sure no other family misses their chance.

If you’re trying to make sense of complex legal and medical terms, our Asbestos Lexicon explains the terminology in plain English. For a deeper understanding of how mesothelioma lawsuits actually work—from proving liability to calculating damages—visit our Complete Guide to Mesothelioma Lawsuits.

— Firm Founder, Justinian Lane

Free Case Review | No Fees Unless We Win | Call 833-4-ASBESTOS

Delaware Asbestos Law Summary

Delaware Asbestos Law Details

Delaware’s legal framework for asbestos litigation draws on its general tort principles, with significant adaptations for the unique nature of asbestos-related diseases—including their long latency periods, complex causation, and evolving evidentiary standards.

Statutes of Limitation and Repose

Delaware imposes a two-year statute of limitations for personal injury and wrongful death claims arising from asbestos exposure (10 Del. C. § 8119). However, Delaware courts recognize a discovery rule for inherently unknowable injuries like asbestos-related diseases. This means the two-year clock begins when the plaintiff knew or reasonably should have known that their injury was caused by asbestos exposure—not at the time of exposure or first symptoms (Brown v. E.I. duPont de Nemours & Co., 820 A.2d 362 (Del. 2003)).

Delaware also applies a six-year statute of repose to claims arising from improvements to real property (10 Del. C. § 8127). This bars lawsuits against architects, contractors, and property owners for injuries caused by construction-related asbestos exposure more than six years after substantial completion, unless fraud or an extended warranty applies.

There is no product-specific statute of repose, so claims against asbestos manufacturers and suppliers are governed only by the two-year discovery-based limitation period.

Statutes may also be tolled for fraud, and cross-jurisdictional tolling applies in certain mass tort and class action settings (Dow Chem. Corp. v. Blanco, 67 A.3d 392 (Del. 2013)).

Eligibility to Sue

• Injured Individuals: Plaintiffs diagnosed with asbestos-related illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis may bring personal injury claims under Delaware tort law.

• Wrongful Death: Surviving spouses, children, parents, or—in some cases—siblings may file suit under Delaware’s Wrongful Death statute (10 Del. C. § 3724).

• Survivor Actions: Personal representatives may also file survival actions to recover for damages suffered by the decedent before death (10 Del. C. § 3701).

Delaware allows both wrongful death and survival actions, which may proceed in tandem.

Workers’ Compensation Limitations

Under 19 Del. C. § 2304, Delaware’s workers’ compensation system is the exclusive remedy for employees harmed by asbestos exposure at work. However, claims may still be brought against third parties such as product manufacturers, suppliers, or premises owners.

An employer is only liable in tort if the injury was caused outside the scope of employment or if the employer was uninsured (19 Del. C. § 2374(e)). Insurers enjoy the same immunity from tort suits as employers themselves.

Damages and Caps

Delaware does not impose statutory caps on economic or noneconomic damages in asbestos-related personal injury or wrongful death cases. Plaintiffs may recover the full value of medical expenses, lost income, pain and suffering, and emotional distress, subject only to general tort standards of reasonableness and proof.

Delaware also permits recovery for survival damages (e.g., pre-death medical costs and lost wages) and wrongful death losses suffered by family members, including loss of financial support and companionship (10 Del. C. §§ 3701–3724).

Punitive damages are permitted in cases involving reckless, wanton, or malicious conduct, such as when a defendant willfully concealed asbestos hazards. While Delaware has no statutory cap on punitive damages, they must be proportional to compensatory damages and satisfy constitutional due process limits. Courts generally require a reasonable relationship between the punitive award and the actual harm suffered (Cloroben Chem. Corp. v. Comegys, 464 A.2d 887 (Del. 1983)).

Punitive damages must be proven by clear and convincing evidence, a higher standard than the civil preponderance standard. Delaware does not impose a fixed multiplier (e.g., 3x actual damages), but will assess excessiveness on a case-by-case basis.

Comparative Fault and Joint Liability

Delaware follows modified comparative negligence (10 Del. C. § 8132). A plaintiff may recover damages only if their own fault is not greater than the combined fault of all defendants.

The state uses joint and several liability when the plaintiff is found to be 0% at fault—meaning any single defendant can be required to pay the full judgment. This is particularly important in asbestos cases involving bankrupt or missing companies.

Collateral Source Rule

Delaware applies a limited collateral source rule, meaning plaintiffs generally cannot recover twice for the same loss, and certain external payments may reduce the final award.

The traditional rule barred defendants from introducing evidence that a plaintiff received compensation from sources like insurance or government benefits. However, the Delaware Supreme Court significantly narrowed this rule in Stayton v. Delaware Health Corp., 117 A.3d 521 (Del. 2015). In Stayton, the court held that plaintiffs cannot recover medical expenses that were written off by Medicare or Medicaid. Only the amounts actually paid—not the billed charges—are recoverable when public insurance is involved.

Key applications:

• Medicare and Medicaid: Plaintiffs may recover only the amount actually paid, not the full billed amount. Write-offs are not considered damages.

• Private Insurance: The rule may still apply in some cases to prevent defendants from reducing awards based on benefits plaintiffs paid for themselves.

• Workers’ Compensation and Disability: Payments may be deducted from the verdict if the employer or carrier has a lien, or if they reduce the plaintiff's out-of-pocket expenses.

Delaware law balances preventing double recovery with protecting benefits the plaintiff has secured independently. In general, if a third party paid for the benefit or forgave part of the debt (like Medicare), the jury award may be reduced accordingly.

Standards of Proof and Causation

To succeed in an asbestos case, plaintiffs must show that asbestos exposure was a proximate cause of their disease. Delaware applies the “but-for” causation standard, rejecting the “substantial factor” test except in certain workers’ compensation settings.

Expert testimony is required to establish causation in most asbestos-related cancer claims. Delaware follows a flexible approach to expert admissibility, consistent with common law standards and Delaware Rules of Evidence (D.R.E. 702). Courts typically require the testimony to be reliable, relevant, and based on scientific methods, though Delaware does not follow Daubert by name.

Punitive damages may be awarded for reckless, wanton, or malicious conduct, including willful disregard of known asbestos risks. No statutory cap exists, but punitive awards must bear a reasonable relationship to compensatory damages (see Cloroben Chem. Corp. v. Comegys, 464 A.2d 887 (Del. 1983)).

How Delaware’s Laws Work in Practice

Meet Harold, a 71-year-old retired shipyard welder from Wilmington. From 1972 to 1995, he worked in a large industrial facility where he was regularly exposed to asbestos insulation, pipe coverings, and fireproofing materials. In May 2024, Harold was diagnosed with pleural mesothelioma after several months of coughing, fatigue, and weight loss.

Because Delaware uses the discovery rule, Harold’s two-year statute of limitations began in May 2024, when he first learned that asbestos exposure caused his illness—not when the exposure occurred decades earlier (10 Del. C. § 8119; Brown v. DuPont, 820 A.2d 362 (Del. 2003)). He now has until May 2026 to file a personal injury lawsuit.

Delaware does not have a product-specific statute of repose, so Harold’s claims against manufacturers are not barred by the age of the asbestos products. However, if he wanted to sue a contractor or architect who worked on the facility, a six-year statute of repose might block those claims if the building was completed more than six years ago (10 Del. C. § 8127).

Because Harold’s employer provided workers’ compensation, he cannot sue the employer directly. But he can bring claims against third parties, including the product manufacturers and premises owners. If he were suing a landowner for hidden asbestos hazards, the court would examine whether he was hired to work with asbestos or if the hazard was unknown to him.

Harold’s award will not be subject to damage caps. He can seek full compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and noneconomic losses. If his lawyers prove that a company knowingly concealed asbestos risks, he may also receive punitive damages, which Delaware allows in cases of reckless or malicious conduct—subject to proportionality but not a fixed dollar cap.

However, because Harold’s treatment was covered by Medicare, his medical expense recovery will be limited to the amount actually paid, not the original billed charges. The Delaware Supreme Court’s Stayton ruling prevents plaintiffs from recovering “phantom damages” written off by government insurers.

Finally, Delaware follows modified comparative fault: Harold can recover damages if he’s less than 51% at fault, and any award will be reduced by his share of responsibility. If a company that contributed to his exposure is bankrupt or missing, joint and several liability may allow Harold to recover the full amount from the remaining defendants—provided he’s found 0% at fault.

This is a hypothetical example based on real Delaware laws. Every case is different. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, call 833-4-ASBESTOS to learn how Delaware law may apply to your situation.

Ready For Help?

Don't hesitate to contact our firm using the form provided below. Our skilled legal team is prepared to help you navigate the intricacies of asbestos law, ensuring you secure the compensation you're entitled to. Keep in mind, each case is unique and our approach is to provide individualized guidance that suits your particular circumstances.

Free Case Review | No Fees Unless We Win | Call 833-4-ASBESTOS