Legal Lexicon Definitions: Key Terms in Asbestos Law
Legal Standards & Burdens
Burden of Proof and Legal Thresholds in Asbestos Cases This category explains the standards courts use to evaluate evidence in asbestos litigation, including burdens of proof, causation tests, and admissibility rules. Whether a plaintiff must prove exposure was a “substantial factor” or meet the “preponderance of evidence” threshold depends on these doctrines. Mastering them is critical for litigators on both sides of a claim
The following 4 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Burden of Proof — In asbestos litigation, the burden of proof is the plaintiff's obligation to provide sufficient evidence linking asbestos exposure to their injury or disease.
Clear and Convincing Evidence — A legal standard of proof that is higher than the preponderance of evidence but lower than proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
ILO Standard — The ILO Standard is a set of guidelines used for classifying chest radiographs for pneumoconiosis, including asbestosis.
Preponderance of the Evidence — The standard of proof in civil cases, requiring that the evidence presented by one party be more convincing than that presented by the opposing party.
Types of Legal Claims
Legal Pathways for Asbestos Victims This category outlines the various claims available to those harmed by asbestos, including personal injury, wrongful death, premises liability, product liability, and trust fund claims. Understanding these claim types helps victims and their families pursue compensation through the most effective legal channels based on their circumstances.
The following 2 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Class Action — A lawsuit where a group of people with similar claims sue as a single entity.
Mass Tort — A legal action involving multiple plaintiffs filing a lawsuit against one or more defendants, often related to asbestos exposure.
Legal Terminology
Terms That Define the Legal Landscape of Asbestos Litigation This category includes key legal terms that appear frequently in asbestos litigation, such as “burden of proof,” “proximate cause,” “joint and several liability,” and “statute of limitations.” These terms form the foundation of how asbestos claims are structured, argued, and resolved in court. Understanding them is essential for navigating legal documents, pleadings, and case law.
The following 24 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Asbestos Trust — A financial entity established to manage and distribute compensation to victims of asbestos-related diseases from bankrupt asbestos companies.
Breach of Warranty — A failure to fulfill the terms of a promise, claim, or representation made by a seller to a buyer concerning the quality or type of product, which in this context can relate to asbestos-containing products.
De Novo — A legal term meaning 'anew' or 'from the beginning,' often used in the context of a trial or review where the case is considered as if it had not been heard before.
Defendant — In a lawsuit, the defendant is the person or entity being sued, accused of causing harm or injury to the plaintiff.
Deposition — A sworn, out-of-court testimony used in asbestos litigation to gather evidence and assess witness credibility.
Discovery — The pre-trial phase in a lawsuit where each party can obtain evidence from the opposing party.
Fact Witness — A person who testifies about events or facts they have personally observed or experienced.
Genuine Issue of Material Fact — A dispute over a fact that could affect the outcome of a lawsuit, which must be resolved by a jury or judge.
Interlocutory — An order or decision made by a court during a lawsuit that addresses a specific issue but does not resolve the entire case.
Interrogatory — A formal set of written questions used in legal proceedings to gather evidence and information.
Lay Witness — A non-expert witness who testifies to facts they have personally observed.
Manufacturing Defect — A flaw in a product occurring during production, potentially leading to legal liability in asbestos cases.
Material Fact — A fact significant and relevant to the issues being decided in a legal case, impacting the outcome if known.
MDL (Multi-District Litigation) — A legal process consolidating multiple similar lawsuits into a single federal court for pretrial proceedings.
Plaintiff — The party who initiates a lawsuit by filing a complaint with the court, seeking legal remedies for harm caused by asbestos exposure.
Pro Hac Vice — A legal term allowing an out-of-state attorney to appear in court for a particular case.
Request for Production — A legal tool used in the discovery process to request documents or items relevant to the case.
Scintilla of Evidence — The smallest amount of evidence necessary to support a fact or point in a legal case, sufficient to allow the case to proceed to the jury.
Standing — The legal right to initiate a lawsuit, requiring a demonstrated connection to and harm from the challenged action.
Statute of Limitation — The legal time limit within which a lawsuit must be filed after an injury or harm has occurred.
Subrogation — The legal process allowing an insurer to seek reimbursement from the party responsible for damage after paying a claim.
Summary Judgment — A legal decision made by a court without a full trial, where the judge determines that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that one party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Wards of the admiralty — Maritime workers exposed to asbestos and under the legal protection of admiralty courts.
Workers’ Compensation — Insurance providing wage replacement and medical benefits to employees injured by asbestos exposure in the workplace.
Legal Doctrines & Liabilities
Legal Doctrines and Theories of Asbestos Liability This category explores the legal principles used to hold companies accountable for asbestos-related harm. Topics include product liability, duty to warn, failure to test, successor liability, and the bare metal defense. These doctrines shape how courts assign responsibility, determine negligence, and assess damages in asbestos litigation — making them essential knowledge for legal professionals and claimants alike.
The following 22 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Causation — The principle that a defendant's actions must be shown to have caused the plaintiff's injury, crucial in asbestos litigation to establish liability.
Choice of Law — The legal principle determining which jurisdiction's laws apply to a case involving multiple jurisdictions, crucial in asbestos litigation.
Collateral Estoppel — A legal doctrine that prevents a party from relitigating an issue already decided in a previous case.
Component Parts Doctrine — A legal principle stating that a manufacturer of a non-defective component part is not liable for injuries caused by the final product if the component was integrated into the product by another party.
Design Defect — A legal concept where a product's design is inherently unsafe, making it unreasonably dangerous for its intended use.
Discovery Rule — The discovery rule delays the statute of limitations until the injury and its cause are known or should have been known.
Duty to Warn — The legal obligation to inform about asbestos hazards.
Failure to Warn — A legal doctrine where a manufacturer is liable for not warning about asbestos dangers.
Foreseeable — In asbestos litigation, a harm or injury is foreseeable if a reasonable person could have anticipated it at the time of exposure.
Gross Negligence — Gross negligence refers to a severe lack of care or extreme recklessness that indicates a conscious disregard for the safety of others.
Informed Consent — Informed consent is the process ensuring individuals make educated decisions about medical procedures or legal actions after being given all relevant information.
Joint and Several Liability — A legal doctrine allowing a plaintiff to recover the entire amount of damages from any one of multiple defendants, regardless of their individual share of liability.
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) — The Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) is a federal law providing compensation and medical care to maritime employees injured on the job, including those exposed to asbestos.
Maintenance and Cure — A maritime legal doctrine requiring ship owners to provide medical care and living expenses to injured or ill seamen until maximum medical improvement.
Market Share Liability — A legal doctrine where multiple defendants can be held liable for a plaintiff's injuries in proportion to their share of the market.
Negligence — Negligence is a legal concept where a party fails to exercise the care that a reasonably prudent person would exercise in similar circumstances, leading to harm or injury to another party.
Precautionary Principle — A legal guideline advocating preventive action against potential harm, even without full scientific certainty.
Proximate Cause — Proximate cause establishes a direct link between a defendant's actions and a plaintiff's injury in asbestos litigation.
Res Ipsa Loquitur — A legal doctrine allowing an inference of negligence when an accident's occurrence suggests it would not have happened without negligence, and the instrumentality was under the defendant's control.
Sophisticated User Doctrine — A legal principle that may shield manufacturers from liability if the injured party was knowledgeable about the product's dangers.
Statute of Repose — A legal limitation on the time period within which a lawsuit can be filed from the date of the act that caused the injury.
Strict Liability — A legal doctrine that holds a defendant liable for harm caused by their product or actions, regardless of fault or negligence.
Legal Strategy & Defense Tactics
Legal Strategies in Asbestos Litigation This category examines the litigation playbook used by both plaintiffs and defense teams in asbestos cases. Topics include evidentiary tactics, the bare metal defense, use of expert testimony, and strategies for proving or denying causation. These entries provide insight into how legal teams construct or challenge claims involving occupational exposure and corporate knowledge.
The following 1 Lexicon entry are assigned to this category:
Bare Metal Defense — A legal defense strategy where manufacturers argue they are not liable for asbestos-related injuries because they did not supply the asbestos.
Jurisdiction & Venue
Where and How Asbestos Cases Are Filed This category looks at the geographic and procedural aspects of asbestos litigation: which court hears the case, why certain venues are preferred, and how jurisdictional rules affect outcomes. Topics include forum shopping, multidistrict litigation (MDL), and state-specific procedural quirks that influence both strategy and speed.
The following 3 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Forum Non Conveniens — A legal doctrine allowing a court to dismiss a case if it believes another jurisdiction would be more convenient.
Personal Jurisdiction — The authority of a court to make decisions binding on individuals or corporations based on their connection to the jurisdiction.
Venue — The geographic location where a legal case is heard, crucial in asbestos litigation.
Government Regulations & Policies
How Governments Responded to Asbestos This category explores the laws, policies, and enforcement actions implemented by governments around the world to manage asbestos risks. Topics include U.S. EPA and OSHA regulations, international bans, and shifting standards over time. These entries help explain how policy evolved in response to mounting evidence — and how regulatory gaps contributed to prolonged exposure.
Evidence & Expert Standards
Proving Asbestos Cases: Evidence and Expertise This category examines the standards used to evaluate medical and scientific evidence in asbestos litigation. Topics include expert qualifications, admissibility rules, and diagnostic criteria like ILO classifications and B-reader standards. These tools are key to building or contesting causation in legal settings.
The following 4 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Daubert — A legal standard used to assess the admissibility of expert witness testimony in federal courts.
Expert Witness — An individual with specialized knowledge who testifies in court to help understand evidence or facts of a case.
Frye — The Frye standard is a legal test used to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence in court, requiring that the scientific technique or principle be generally accepted in the relevant scientific community.
Rule 702 — A Federal Rule of Evidence governing the admissibility of expert testimony in federal courts.
Legal Damages & Remedies
Compensation and Remedies for Asbestos Harm This category explores the types of compensation available in asbestos cases, from medical costs and lost wages to punitive damages and wrongful death awards. It also includes trust fund payouts and structured settlements. These entries help clarify what victims and their families can recover — and what arguments determine how much.
The following 6 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Damage Caps — Limits set by law on the amount of compensatory or punitive damages that can be awarded in a lawsuit.
Economic Damages — Monetary losses that can be quantified and compensated, such as medical expenses, lost wages, and loss of earning capacity.
Exemplary Damages — Damages awarded to punish and deter willful, wanton, or malicious conduct.
Loss of Consortium — A legal claim for damages that compensates a spouse for the loss of companionship, affection, and support due to the injury of their partner.
Noneconomic Damages — Damages awarded for intangible losses such as pain, suffering, and emotional distress.
Punitive Damages — Monetary compensation awarded to punish egregious misconduct and deter similar conduct in the future.
Court Procedures
How Asbestos Cases Move Through the Courts This category details the procedural machinery behind asbestos litigation — from filing and discovery to motion practice, trial, and settlement. It also covers specialized procedures like case consolidation, expedited dockets, and trust claim discovery. These entries explain the mechanics behind what happens once a lawsuit is filed.
The following 3 Lexicon entries are assigned to this category:
Jury Instruction — Directions given by a judge to a jury on how to apply the law and evaluate evidence in a case.
Motion in Limine — A pre-trial request to exclude certain evidence or arguments from being presented in court.
Voir Dire — The process of questioning prospective jurors to determine their suitability for serving on a jury.
Looking for other categories? Visit the Lexicon Index to browse all 30 categories by topic.