Abstract
The article "Evaluation of Two Cleaning Methods for the Removal of Asbestos Fibers from Carpet" by J.R. Kominsky, R.W. Freyberg, J. Chesson, W.C. Cain, T.J. Powers, and R.C. Wilmoth, published in the American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, examines the effectiveness of two cleaning methods—HEPA-filtered dry vacuuming and HEPA-filtered hot water extraction (wet cleaning)—in removing asbestos fibers from carpets. The study found that wet cleaning reduced asbestos contamination in carpets by approximately 70%, while dry vacuuming showed no significant change. However, both methods increased airborne asbestos concentrations during cleaning, with levels rising two to four times higher than pre-cleaning levels. These findings highlight the potential health risks associated with improper asbestos cleaning methods and emphasize the importance of using effective techniques to minimize exposure.
Legal Relevance
This study provides critical evidence for asbestos-related legal claims, particularly in cases involving exposure in buildings with asbestos-contaminated carpets. The findings demonstrate that improper cleaning methods, such as dry vacuuming, fail to effectively remove asbestos fibers and may even increase airborne asbestos concentrations, thereby exacerbating exposure risks. This evidence can support claims of negligence against building owners, employers, or custodial service providers who failed to implement safe cleaning practices or adequately protect individuals from exposure.
The study also highlights the importance of using effective cleaning methods, such as wet cleaning with HEPA filtration, to reduce asbestos contamination. If a plaintiff’s exposure occurred in a setting where these precautions were not taken, the findings can be used to argue that responsible parties failed to meet safety standards, contributing to the plaintiff’s asbestos-related disease. This strengthens the case for liability and compensation, particularly for individuals suffering from mesothelioma, lung cancer, or other asbestos-related conditions.
Additionally, the study’s data on airborne asbestos reentrainment during cleaning activities can counter common defense claims that exposure levels were negligible or that cleaning methods were sufficient. By demonstrating the risks of increased airborne asbestos during cleaning, the study provides a pathway to establish causation and negligence in legal proceedings.
Occupation Groups at Risk
The study’s findings are particularly relevant to the following occupation groups, who may face heightened risks of asbestos exposure due to contaminated carpets and cleaning activities:
Custodial Workers
Custodial staff responsible for cleaning carpets in older buildings are at significant risk of exposure, especially if improper cleaning methods, such as dry vacuuming, are used. The study highlights the increased airborne asbestos concentrations during cleaning, which directly impacts these workers.
Construction and Renovation Workers
Workers involved in remodeling or demolition activities in older buildings may encounter asbestos-contaminated carpets. The study underscores the importance of proper cleaning and handling methods to prevent exposure during such activities.
HVAC Technicians and Appliance Workers
These professionals often work in environments where asbestos-contaminated carpets may be present, particularly in older buildings. The study’s findings on airborne asbestos reentrainment are critical for understanding the risks they face during routine maintenance or repairs.
Building Maintenance Personnel
Maintenance workers in schools, offices, or industrial facilities with asbestos-containing materials (ACM) are at risk, especially if carpets act as reservoirs for asbestos fibers. The study’s emphasis on effective cleaning methods is crucial for minimizing their exposure.
Industrial and Utility Workers
Employees in older industrial or utility facilities may encounter asbestos-contaminated carpets, particularly in areas with aging infrastructure. The study’s findings highlight the need for stringent cleaning protocols to protect these workers.
By addressing these high-risk groups, the study provides valuable insights for legal cases involving occupational asbestos exposure.
Current Medical Understanding
The study aligns with current medical knowledge regarding the health risks of asbestos exposure. It accurately identifies the dangers of airborne asbestos reentrainment during cleaning activities and the ineffectiveness of dry vacuuming in reducing asbestos contamination. The findings reinforce the understanding that even small asbestos fibers can pose significant health risks, including mesothelioma, lung cancer, and asbestosis. However, the study’s controlled conditions may not fully replicate real-world scenarios, and further research in actual custodial operations is necessary to validate its conclusions.
Citation
Kominsky, J.R., Freyberg, R.W., Chesson, J., Cain, W.C., Powers, T.J., & Wilmoth, R.C. (1990). Evaluation of Two Cleaning Methods for the Removal of Asbestos Fibers from Carpet. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 51(9), 500-504.
National Library of Medicine Link
Unfortunately, a direct link to the National Library of Medicine’s page for this study is not available. However, readers are encouraged to consult the American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal for further details.
Contact Us Today
If you or a loved one has been exposed to asbestos and developed mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, or other asbestos-related conditions, our legal team is here to help. The findings of this study underscore the dangers of improper asbestos management and the importance of holding negligent parties accountable. Contact us today for a free consultation. We specialize in obtaining compensation for individuals affected by asbestos exposure and will fight to ensure you receive the justice you deserve. Call us now or fill out our online form to get started.
