Occupation And Lung Cancer Risk: An Analysis By Histologic Subtypes - (1985)

Authors: J.E. Vena,T.E. Byers,D. Cookfair,M.K. Swanson
Published In: Cancer

Epidemiology of Primary Malignant Mesothelial Tumors in Canada: Legal and Medical Insights for Asbestos-Related Claims

Abstract
The study "Epidemiology of Primary Malignant Mesothelial Tumors in Canada" by McDonald et al., published in Cancer in 1970, investigates the occurrence of malignant mesothelioma in Canada and its association with asbestos exposure. Researchers analyzed all known fatal cases of mesothelioma in Canada from 1959 to 1968, focusing on occupational and environmental exposure to asbestos. The study found a strong link between mesothelioma and definite or probable occupational asbestos exposure, with a latency period ranging from 16 to 50 years. It also highlighted the potential for non-occupational exposure, such as household contact with asbestos-contaminated clothing, to contribute to disease development. These findings emphasize the significant health risks posed by asbestos exposure, even in cases of indirect contact.

Legal Relevance
This study provides critical evidence for asbestos-related legal claims, particularly for individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma. The research establishes a strong causal relationship between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma, which is essential for proving causation in litigation. Key legal implications include:

  1. Evidence Pathways: The study documents the latency period of 16 to 50 years between asbestos exposure and mesothelioma diagnosis, supporting claims that exposure decades earlier can lead to disease.
  2. Occupational History Relevance: The detailed analysis of high-risk occupations strengthens the argument for employer negligence or failure to provide a safe working environment.
  3. Counterarguments to Defense Claims: The study’s findings on non-occupational exposure, such as household contact with asbestos-contaminated clothing, counter defense arguments that only direct occupational exposure is relevant. This is particularly important for secondary exposure cases.
  4. Smoking and Mesothelioma: The study found no significant difference in smoking habits between cases with and without occupational asbestos exposure, reinforcing that asbestos, not smoking, is the primary cause of mesothelioma.

By presenting robust epidemiological data, this study supports claims of employer liability and strengthens the case for compensation for individuals affected by asbestos-related diseases.

Occupation Groups at Risk
The study identifies several high-risk occupations where workers were likely exposed to asbestos. These include:

  • Shipbuilding and Repair: Workers involved in ship construction, overhauling, or breaking were frequently exposed to asbestos used in insulation and fireproofing materials.
  • Construction and Demolition: Occupations involving soundproofing, fireproofing, or demolishing buildings often exposed workers to asbestos-containing materials.
  • Boiler and Pipe Insulation: Workers installing or maintaining large boilers and steam pipes were at high risk due to the use of asbestos for heat retention.
  • Brake and Clutch Manufacturing: Individuals manufacturing or handling brake linings and clutch plates were exposed to asbestos fibers used in these products.
  • Mining and Milling: Workers in asbestos mines or mills faced direct exposure to raw asbestos fibers.
  • Textile Industry: Workers handling asbestos-containing textiles were at risk due to the airborne fibers released during manufacturing.

These occupations are particularly relevant in legal cases, as they demonstrate the foreseeability of harm and the failure of employers to protect workers from known risks.

Current Medical Understanding
The study aligns with current medical knowledge, which recognizes asbestos as the primary cause of mesothelioma. Modern research confirms the long latency period and the role of both occupational and secondary exposure in disease development. The study’s findings remain a cornerstone in understanding the epidemiology of mesothelioma and the health risks of asbestos exposure. However, advancements in molecular biology and epidemiology have further clarified the mechanisms of asbestos-induced carcinogenesis, providing even stronger evidence for its role in mesothelioma and other cancers.

Citation
McDonald, A. D., Harper, A., McDonald, J. C., & el-Attar, O. A. (1970). Epidemiology of primary malignant mesothelial tumors in Canada. Cancer, 26(4), 914-919. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197010)26:4<914::aid-cncr2820260427>3.0.co;2-h

National Library of Medicine Link
For additional context and credibility, you can access the study on the National Library of Medicine’s website: PubMed Link.

Contact Us Today
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, or other asbestos-related diseases, you may be entitled to compensation. Our experienced legal team specializes in asbestos litigation and can help you navigate the legal process to secure the justice and financial support you deserve. Contact us today for a free consultation and let us fight for your rights.